Letting an employee go is a difficult situation most managers want to avoid, but with the right preparation and professionalism, you can get through such a tough talk with your dignity (and your employee’s) intact.
Firing Best Practices
Another manager or HR representative should always be present, especially if terminating a potentially hostile employee or one who might twist your words or make false accusations. It is also best to include a balance of genders, says Lissa Weimelt, principal with The Hiring Experts, a retained executive search firm.
The best place to terminate is a private office or meeting room close to an exit—there is nothing worse than an upset employee having to traipse through a workplace to find his way out.
Out of respect for and fairness to the employee, terminate as early in the workweek and day as possible. In addition, bring tissues and water as well as the phone number for an employee assistance program representative, if available, says Scott Cawood, PhD, president of ModernThink, an employee management consulting firm.
“If you let someone work all day, then they are giving to the company, and other employees will see this as disrespectful that you let them give all day long, or all week long, then fired them at the last possible moment,” says Cawood, author of Destination Profit: Creating People-Profit Opportunities in Your Organization. “Fire them early and pay them for the day, but let them leave right after the meeting.
There are logistical issues to work out, too. Cawood once had to terminate an employee who used a company car. How will that employee get home? Finally, have any necessary paperwork or documents ready to avoid scrambling for them as the employee tries to leave.
What to Say and How to Say It
When the time comes, it’s best to just get down to business, says Pamela Holland, author of Help! Was That a Career Limiting Move? and chief operating officer of Brody Communications. “The termination discussion should be as brief as possible,” she says. “Your tone should be calm and assertive.”
According to Weimelt, ex-employees often criticize former employers for giving vague reasons for termination. “Being prepared, staying calm and speaking respectfully is critical to a termination procedure,” she says. “Many employees actually know when they are not doing a good job. If the termination itself is handled well, an ex-employee is less likely to blame the employer for being fired.”
Managers should know that saying too much can get them into legal hot water, says Weimelt. Therefore, it’s important to make a prepared, written statement that can be placed in the employee’s personnel file, such as:
Cawood says it’s important to get to the point quickly. “You should let someone know the real deal within three minutes of the start of the meeting,” he says. “Don’t worry about breaking the ice. There is nothing you can do that will make the message pleasurable.”
After You Drop the Bomb
According to Weimelt, employees may have a variety of questions, including:
• Can you give me an example of what I did wrong?
• Will I get a reference from you?
• Can I file for unemployment?
• Are you going to tell other employees I am fired?
• Do I get any severance?
The best policy overall is to avoid being backed into the specifics trap and refer any questions regarding company policy to HR.
Managers need to keep sight of the bigger picture. “The important thing to remember is that your role as a manager is to ensure that certain deliverables are being met in keeping with the company’s strategic direction,” says Holland. “When someone fails to do that in his or her job, either because of lack of ability or bad judgment, you must draw strength in the fact that by terminating that person, you are fulfilling your obligations and doing the right thing.”
It’s also important to remember that your delivery can help soften the blow. “There is never an easy way to share hard information,” says Cawood. “You can, however, be sensitive to the employee’s need to process the data, be upset and avoid being embarrassed.”
The firing manager must have good documentation. For example, if the employee skills are not suitable for the job, make sure that the supervisor and the employee agree on an action plan. This will show that the supervisor's intention was to help the employee improve his/her skills prior to termination. I agree, if the employees has questions, the correct thing to do is preferred the questions to the company's policy HR.
I believe GKittredge's comment is more convenice than the artical itself.
The article is about actual termination. We should probably just assume that appropriate procedures and policies were followed up to that point, since that's not really the point of the article. I don't find the article at all one-sided. I have fired several people that I liked, and they knew it was coming because they were not performing. I am well aware that it could happen to me if I don't perform. It could happen to me even if I do (I have survived two rounds of downsizing). As the article states, most companies (and any company interested in its employees) will have specific HR policies in place an available to employees to answer the "unanswered questions" from the example. Job security, regardless of the environment, is never entirely at the hands of the employee. If a unionized workforce needs to be down-sized, it will still happen. Employers cannot always plan for every eventuality in business. Also, managers have to concern themselves with more than one employee. What about the "lack of concern" for the rest of the workforce, whose performance and livelihoods are jeopardized by an underperformer? Is it fair to allow that employee to damage the company in a competitive environment just because we don't want to fire someone? Trish, I think your points about making sure employees receive feedback and training and that managers really need to understand the jobs of line employees are valid, and I'm sure not everyone gets a fair shake before they are terminated. That doesn't mean that employers shouldn't be allowed to fire people.
too bad that this is so one sided and it shows such a lack of concern for the employee.. such as it is everywhere, why do employees leave with questions unanswered when there was time to work with the employee and train them better, I think job security should not be at the hands of the employer, when the employee is the person submitting themselves to the environment. I do believe there needs to be policy changes regarding these matters, so right to work states and private sectors are held accountable to these matters and people do not become praey to small clicks and management who may not know the true skills in the trade involved with an employee under scrutiny. I see how sad it is that everyone blogging acts like they are immune to termination themselves. One sided behavior implicates businesses in America into the power tripping, us and them mentality. We better change this, since outsourcing may bring armies of people into our country who may bring their newfounded respect factors here, who may turn to teach current managers new needs will need to be met, and angers will not turn to civil wars over America's policies to terminate without being properly attended to as a human beingterminate without being properly attended to as a human being.
I found the article to be informative. It opened the dialogue for even more points to be made, and I'm looking forward to reading them all!
I am someone who is moving into a management position and may at some time face this very important issue, thank you for this tip....:O)
The decision to discharge an employee should be carefully planned, and the use of a "termination checklist" by HR personnel can be of benefit to both the employer and the employee. This checklist should include: 1. Know precisely why the employee is being dismissed. 2. Set a private appointment in your office to ensure control and privacy. Under no circumstances should the dismissal be done on the telephone, by email, or in a social setting. 3. There is never a good time to dismiss, but an early Monday or Tuesday is preferred to a 5 pm on Friday. 4. Keep the meeting brief. Get the bad news out at the offset. Avoid platitudes. 5. Let the dismissed employee have an opportunity to get his or her "side across, without interuption. However, keep control of the meeting. 6. Do not discuss the situation with any other employee. 7. Have any final payroll checks, benefits, or vacation payments prepared in advance. 8. Regardless of the reason for termination, be sure the employee understands his/her rights regarding employee benefits (i.e. group insurance continuation, pension plan electives, unemployment insurance, etc.). Also be aware that while most employees respond to a dismissal with shock and anger, if the process is well planned and executed, it rarely reaches the level anticipated or feared by managers. George Kittredge www.laborandemploymentlawblog.com
There are challenges in dealing with a "just culture" and working through discipline and termination. For the example above, would there have been conversations, goals for PIP set in prior conversations?